UK Publishers Call on Prime Minister to Defend Intellectual Property at AI Summit
Image Credit: Stephen Phillips | Splash
The UK's leading publishers have formally urged Prime Minister Rishi Sunak to reaffirm the country's commitment to protecting intellectual property rights during the upcoming international summit on artificial intelligence in November. The appeal arrives as legal and ethical debates intensify over how generative AI systems are being trained using vast repositories of digital content, including material produced by authors, researchers, and artists.
The letter, submitted by the Publishers Association—which represents producers of digital and print books, academic journals, and educational materials—highlights growing concern that the rights of content creators may be undermined in the rush to develop AI technologies.
[Read More: DeepSeek AI Faces Security and Privacy Backlash Amid OpenAI Data Theft Allegations]
Generative AI Training Sparks Legal Disputes
At the heart of the controversy lies the training method of generative AI models like OpenAI’s ChatGPT. These systems rely on enormous datasets, many of which are scraped from publicly accessible internet content, including copyrighted books and articles. Critics argue that such data harvesting often occurs without proper licensing or compensation to rights holders.
Several authors in the United States, including Sarah Silverman, Mona Awad, and Paul Tremblay, have filed lawsuits against OpenAI, alleging the unauthorized use of their novels for training AI models. In its recent response, OpenAI contested the claims, stating that the plaintiffs "misconceived the scope" of U.S. copyright law and defended the use of copyrighted material in what it describes as "transformative" ways, which it argues are permissible under fair use.
UK Government Previously Considered Copyright Exemption for AI
In 2022, the UK Intellectual Property Office proposed a controversial exemption that would allow AI developers to use copyrighted material—such as books and music—without needing a license, provided the use was for training AI systems. This suggestion faced significant backlash from creators and industry stakeholders, leading the government to eventually retract the proposal.
A recent parliamentary report criticized the government’s handling of the issue, citing a "clear lack of understanding" of the priorities and vulnerabilities of the UK’s creative industries.
[Read More: Is AI Indeed a Theft? A New Perspective on Learning and Creativity]
Publishing Sector Emphasizes Economic and Cultural Importance
In its letter, the Publishers Association emphasized that the UK’s publishing industry is not only a cultural asset but also a major contributor to the national economy. Valued at approximately £7 billion, the sector employs around 70,000 people and supports hundreds of thousands of authors and content creators.
Dan Conway, Chief Executive of the Publishers Association, called on the government to issue a clear statement during the AI summit. He stated,
“On behalf of our industry and the wider content industries, we ask that your government makes a strong statement either as part of, or in parallel with, your summit to make clear that UK intellectual property law should be respected when any content is ingested by AI systems and a licence obtained in advance”.
[Read More: Amazon’s Alexa-Suno Integration Sparks AI Music Copyright Battle]
Government Responds with Plans for Copyright Guidance
In response, a spokesperson for the UK government reiterated its aim to strike a “balanced and pragmatic” approach. The Intellectual Property Office is currently facilitating discussions between AI firms and rights holders to develop guidance and potential agreements that ensure compliance with copyright law, while also supporting the UK’s ambition to be a leader in AI research and innovation.
[Read More: An AI Data Deal Ignites Academic Controversy: Authors Left in the Dark]
Source: The Guardian
